FACTION CHEATING

[Project 7]

Fights 7 v 0..... gets guard wacked

That takes skill!

 

[Project 7]

You are obviously not qualified to speak about factions, Minax has the koreans, not SL. and COM has super A.D.D., which is why they didnt have any towns before hiring Minax to baby sit. Everyone so used to sucking dick for wut they get, they forget wut earning a trophy isntead of buying it is like.

Who are you?

 

[Boomshakalaka]

I haven't heard this much crying since Tyler rage quit because he couldn't heal ebolt syncs.

that moment when ive beaten you at every aspect of the game as the leader of my squad. you get picked up off the bench chump.

 

[Pat McGroin]

that moment when ive beaten you at every aspect of the game as the leader of my squad. you get picked up off the bench chump.

You have never beaten me at any aspect of the game.

Care to do some 2v2 3v3 4v4 5v5 for gold?

Oh that's right after spending thousands of wasted hours on this game the only thing you can do is alchy.

That's cute

 

[Pat McGroin]

@Boomshakalaka
Mickey has to rely on his buddies to carry him. Which is why he did not offer 1v1

Didn't I 6-0 you?

Man if I suck then you must be horrible.

I am tired of dueling his kid just to have him make some excuse about lag or any other bull shit he can come up with.

 

[Pat McGroin]

Like I said before. You win 6-3 once in your life. You won't duel me anymore because you won't risk losing. I've stomped you every duel we've ever had other than that.
Field and pits.

That's funny because yesterday you said you would be home to post these 3 screen shots that you claimed to have but nothing?

Kind of funny how the ONE time you beat me you had death screen shots turned on but no other time?

Yea 6-0 and you're lucky that event started or it would have been 20-0 like every time before that.

 

[Pat McGroin]

Yep the one time you ever beat me.

Congrats on the biggest accomplishment of your life.

I guess that negates the other 1000x I have beat you.

Remember it's alchy, anybody can get a lucky stun

 

[Project 7]

Yep the one time you ever beat me.

Congrats on the biggest accomplishment of your life.

I guess that negates the other 1000x I have beat you.

Remember it's alchy, anybody can get a lucky stun

That's pretty counter-intuitive if you ask me. By saying that someone wins a duel based off of a "lucky" stun then anyone can use that same excuse regardless of the amount of duels lost to that specific person. If i were to lose 1000 times to someone I could claim "anyone can get a lucky stun", does that mean that all of those duels should be negated due to the fact that I claim they got lucky stuns?

 

[Boomshakalaka]

You have never beaten me at any aspect of the game.

Care to do some 2v2 3v3 4v4 5v5 for gold?

Oh that's right after spending thousands of wasted hours on this game the only thing you can do is alchy.

That's cute

In my prime, when I and actual competition played, my group beat you.

I haven't played this game competitively in several years now. I lead my group, you've bench played with yours. The only thing this server comes to complete agreement on is how shini and neon are both better you and carry you. It's funny and cute you think group fights are such a big deal when there is both no competition and heavily scripted combat in group pvp, from automated syncs to delayed macros to healing animation and auto healing.

And I know you don't actually believe I've played this game and dumped more hours into this game than you have, kiddo.

tldr, will alchy duel for firewall

 

[Boomshakalaka]

That's pretty counter-intuitive if you ask me. By saying that someone wins a duel based off of a "lucky" stun then anyone can use that same excuse regardless of the amount of duels lost to that specific person. If i were to lose 1000 times to someone I could claim "anyone can get a lucky stun", does that mean that all of those duels should be negated due to the fact that I claim they got lucky stuns?

no, what's really counter intuitive is pat dueled me one time and quit afterwards for obvious reasons. I'm guessing he only speaks about "anybody can get lucky" once in a while when it suits him the most.

 

[Pepsi_Rox]

 

[Pat McGroin]

That's pretty counter-intuitive if you ask me. By saying that someone wins a duel based off of a "lucky" stun then anyone can use that same excuse regardless of the amount of duels lost to that specific person. If i were to lose 1000 times to someone I could claim "anyone can get a lucky stun", does that mean that all of those duels should be negated due to the fact that I claim they got lucky stuns?

I am not trying to be a dick here but this really has to be one of the stupidest posts I have read on here lol. How would this post be counter-intuitive at all? If you lost to someone 1000-1 then clearly it wasn't based off luck. And you can use that argument with anything not just dueling on ultima online. Have you ever taken a class on statistics? The reason I am using stun as a variable for luck is because you can be spamming a low level spell and get a random stun with out even tabbing and chances are you're going to win if they are below 50 health. Now if you're constantly losing over and over again to the same person then clearly they have a better understanding of how to play there character.

Find anybody with half a brain and try to convince them that a 1000-1 ratio in anything is considered luck.

 

[White Lotus]

How many times are you guys gonna make the same threads. I feel like i could go into any thread on here and if there was no title i would no idea what the fuck the thread is even about. What could you possibly leave as a response that hasn't already been said 100000000 times. What brain function makes this continue ?

 

[Pat McGroin]

In my prime, when I and actual competition played, my group beat you.

I haven't played this game competitively in several years now. I lead my group, you've bench played with yours. The only thing this server comes to complete agreement on is how shini and neon are both better you and carry you. It's funny and cute you think group fights are such a big deal when there is both no competition and heavily scripted combat in group pvp, from automated syncs to delayed macros to healing animation and auto healing.

And I know you don't actually believe I've played this game and dumped more hours into this game than you have, kiddo.

tldr, will alchy duel for firewall

Shini and neon are better then me, which is why I initially chose to play with them (to make me a better player.) But they are also a lot better then you as am I. You have played this game for so long and you literally can't do anything but alchy which makes you a one trick pony and pretty pathetic if you ask me. You have never lead a group and you have never stood a chance against any group I have been in on the field. (but again you have done nothing but pit sit for the last 9 years.) I agree that pvp is very heavily scripted but none of the guys I play with use any of that bull shit and we still win. Btw I have been playing hybrid for about 4 years now at max and you have what 8-9 years?

You do the math big guy.

 

[Pat McGroin]

no, what's really counter intuitive is pat dueled me one time and quit afterwards for obvious reasons. I'm guessing he only speaks about "anybody can get lucky" once in a while when it suits him the most.

I went 9-2 against you the other night when you were on your tet alt. I had someone run your IP to make sure. You can't hide from bitch tits

 

[Sterling Archer]

I'm sorry but how delusional are you two?

I have personally watched mickey mop the floor with you two on MULTIPLE occasions. Is dementia a side effect of playing this game for too long?

Geeeez

 

[Project 7]

I am not trying to be a dick here but this really has to be one of the stupidest posts I have read on here lol. How would this post be counter-intuitive at all? If you lost to someone 1000-1 then clearly it wasn't based off luck. And you can use that argument with anything not just dueling on ultima online. Have you ever taken a class on statistics? The reason I am using stun as a variable for luck is because you can be spamming a low level spell and get a random stun with out even tabbing and chances are you're going to win if they are below 50 health. Now if you're constantly losing over and over again to the same person then clearly they have a better understanding of how to play there character.

Find anybody with half a brain and try to convince them that a 1000-1 ratio in anything is considered luck.

If you would have taken a class on statistics you would understand what I am saying... Lets say you have a 1:8 chance of stunning someone when you try (idk what the actually chance is) that person can stun you every single time for 1000 times in a row or none at all. It's all based on chance so in that case a person can get 1000 "lucky" stuns and you can still claim the same thing that you're claiming right now... I'm in no way claiming that this is probable, but it is possible. So therefore stating that someone won because of a "lucky" stun is not a valid argument.

 

[Pat McGroin]

If you would have taken a class on statistics you would understand what I am saying... Lets say you have a 1:8 chance of stunning someone when you try (idk what the actually chance is) that person can stun you every single time for 1000 times in a row or none at all. It's all based on chance so in that case a person can get 1000 "lucky" stuns and you can still claim the same thing that you're claiming right now... I'm in no way claiming that this is probable, but it is possible. So therefore stating that someone won because of a "lucky" stun is not a valid argument.

You would only have an argument if the other person was not attempting to stun. If both players are attempting stuns at an equal number then your argument is flawed. And regardless of course it's possible, but being that it is HIGHLY unlikely it's pretty stupid to use that as the foundation of your argument.

 

[Pat McGroin]

Take it from someone who is educate.

 

[Pat McGroin]

If you would have taken a class on statistics you would understand what I am saying... Lets say you have a 1:8 chance of stunning someone when you try (idk what the actually chance is) that person can stun you every single time for 1000 times in a row or none at all. It's all based on chance so in that case a person can get 1000 "lucky" stuns and you can still claim the same thing that you're claiming right now... I'm in no way claiming that this is probable, but it is possible. So therefore stating that someone won because of a "lucky" stun is not a valid argument.

And not to mention this game is ran off of code. Being how the game is coded it would be impossible for someone to get 1000 stuns in a row. A player can certainly get more stuns then someone else in a duel but after that many duels there is no way it's going to be just one sided.