UOGamers Community
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
To obtain new Razor updates, please reinstall Razor from our new website.
Demented Jesters Suggested Changes (Revised Poll)
- Thread starter Pepsi_Rox
- Start date
- Status
Reality-hybrid
Wanderer
Re: Demented Jesters Suggested Changes (Revised Poll)
I approve of this thread.
10/10
"Will watch again!"
I approve of this thread.
10/10
"Will watch again!"
Pepsi_Rox
Knight
Re: Demented Jesters Suggested Changes (Revised Poll)
PK's go where there are people to kill for loot. Anti-PK's go to where there are PKs. If PKs go somewhere to find a fight, and Anti-PKs go somewhere they know reds will be, it will cause a hotspot. Anti-PK guilds DO fight without guards, but the majority of reds would now be forced to camp high popular areas between moongates/towns. Statloss would ruin about 1/2 of the "casual PvPers", which sadly, makes up the majority of the pvp playerbase.DementedJester said:
MrBrightside
Knight
Re: Demented Jesters Suggested Changes (Revised Poll)
I think it would be a good idea to wipe factions, I don't like all this hero/evil stuff
I think it would be a good idea to wipe factions, I don't like all this hero/evil stuff
Re: Demented Jesters Suggested Changes (Revised Poll)
like 100 other people already said, even tho the pits are gay because everyone jsut drags bar adn waits for backup, it still gives some pvp. you are probably to new to know, but they removed them and pvp decreased.
loyalty is hawt
Dendei;1303267 said:
like 100 other people already said, even tho the pits are gay because everyone jsut drags bar adn waits for backup, it still gives some pvp. you are probably to new to know, but they removed them and pvp decreased.
loyalty is hawt
Re: Demented Jesters Suggested Changes (Revised Poll)
Without serious anti-grief stuff (ie you can't attack anybody at all ever) people will get griefed. I will tell you right now that when a duel is taking place and both guilds are spectating, when you redline your opponent his guild will MA you and both of you will get restored to full HP.
I'm assuming you don't like how trammies crowd the no-pvp spectator zones around the pits? Well... take out the safety for spectators. Have duels start anywhere on the map, take place in the duel pit where people risk life and limb to come watch, and then after the duel the duelists are teleported back to the starting location without any risk at all of the duel being interrupted.
Why do you want that? I like the dueling systemPepsi_Rox;918022 said:
Without serious anti-grief stuff (ie you can't attack anybody at all ever) people will get griefed. I will tell you right now that when a duel is taking place and both guilds are spectating, when you redline your opponent his guild will MA you and both of you will get restored to full HP. I'm assuming you don't like how trammies crowd the no-pvp spectator zones around the pits? Well... take out the safety for spectators. Have duels start anywhere on the map, take place in the duel pit where people risk life and limb to come watch, and then after the duel the duelists are teleported back to the starting location without any risk at all of the duel being interrupted.
Re: Demented Jesters Suggested Changes (Revised Poll)
Look at the date this post was origionally made at.
Saikron;1311732 said:Why do you want that? I like the dueling system
I'm assuming you don't like how trammies crowd the no-pvp spectator zones around the pits? Well... take out the safety for spectators. Have duels start anywhere on the map, take place in the duel pit where people risk life and limb to come watch, and then after the duel the duelists are teleported back to the starting location without any risk at all of the duel being interrupted.
Look at the date this post was origionally made at.
Re: Demented Jesters Suggested Changes (Revised Poll)
I voted #5 of only. I don't get the faction loyalt thing, most of you people bitch about Dream Team's numbers yet you think its a grand idea to have even larger numbers? factions is best when top faction guilds within the same faction war one another. It creates more pvp.
Problem here is that the majority of factioners fight like point whores because they are point whores, off screening the second their opponent loads explode. Reds in factions, arent really a threat to anyone considering once we start fighting oranges we just get gang raped by every nearby blue.
No factions, no safezones, no mounts would be my ideal system; unfortunately nobody plays divinity because there are no barstools, blessed sandals, runic weapons, punkte or ethereal polar bears.
Id be all about just removing points from the faction system; they serve no purpose but to discourage ballsy pvp.
I voted #5 of only. I don't get the faction loyalt thing, most of you people bitch about Dream Team's numbers yet you think its a grand idea to have even larger numbers? factions is best when top faction guilds within the same faction war one another. It creates more pvp.
Problem here is that the majority of factioners fight like point whores because they are point whores, off screening the second their opponent loads explode. Reds in factions, arent really a threat to anyone considering once we start fighting oranges we just get gang raped by every nearby blue.
No factions, no safezones, no mounts would be my ideal system; unfortunately nobody plays divinity because there are no barstools, blessed sandals, runic weapons, punkte or ethereal polar bears.
Id be all about just removing points from the faction system; they serve no purpose but to discourage ballsy pvp.
- Status