UOGamers Community
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
To obtain new Razor updates, please reinstall Razor from our new website.
[SVN505] [adverserath] Healing other time
- Thread starter adverserath
- Start date
- Status
adverserath
Page
Re: [TESTING] Healing other time
done that on a different computer too. Dont see why it didnt work.
okay, this one should work in txt.
done that on a different computer too. Dont see why it didnt work.
okay, this one should work in txt.
Xavier
Account Terminated
Re: [TESTING] Healing other time
I havent tested it yet, Im checking out the math right now, but I noticed that the b0rked vet time code is literally the 6 lines right before your edits start. Just a suggestion, but it maybe a good idea to fix that too and just call the problem 'broken bandage timers' or something ...
I havent tested it yet, Im checking out the math right now, but I noticed that the b0rked vet time code is literally the 6 lines right before your edits start. Just a suggestion, but it maybe a good idea to fix that too and just call the problem 'broken bandage timers' or something ...
adverserath
Page
Re: [TESTING] Healing other time
Sure, I will check the vet times on OSI too. Just to make sure there are no differences.
Sure, I will check the vet times on OSI too. Just to make sure there are no differences.
adverserath
Page
Re: [TESTING] Healing other time
Okay, I have cleaned up that vet code now.
I have just been on osi to test the speed of self healing too. It was exactly the same. I made a macro in easyuo wish applied a bandage to both characters, both healed the same at 10, 60, 120, 140 dex.
Vet speed is correct. No difference between dex 10-125.
Okay, I have cleaned up that vet code now.
I have just been on osi to test the speed of self healing too. It was exactly the same. I made a macro in easyuo wish applied a bandage to both characters, both healed the same at 10, 60, 120, 140 dex.
Vet speed is correct. No difference between dex 10-125.
adverserath
Page
Re: [TESTING] Healing other time
woops, that should be "FromMilliseconds" not "FromMilliSeconds". Sorry about this. I've made sure this was the right one. I had loads of them on my desktop.
woops, that should be "FromMilliseconds" not "FromMilliSeconds". Sorry about this. I've made sure this was the right one. I had loads of them on my desktop.
adverserath
Page
Re: [TESTING] Healing other time
its a modified version of the UOGuide formula. How slow would you say it is? I will use my easyuo macro again but for xheals. That seemed to compare it well.
its a modified version of the UOGuide formula. How slow would you say it is? I will use my easyuo macro again but for xheals. That seemed to compare it well.
LadyCrimson
Wanderer
Re: [TESTING] Healing other time
setting back to in development
setting back to in development
adverserath
Page
Re: [IN DEVELOPMENT] Healing other time
okay, compared them by healing at the same time. It was quite out. I have tested this one with the following dex. 10, 30, 60, 125, 130, 145. The times seem more synchronised now. Give it a whirl.
okay, compared them by healing at the same time. It was quite out. I have tested this one with the following dex. 10, 30, 60, 125, 130, 145. The times seem more synchronised now. Give it a whirl.
LadyCrimson
Wanderer
Re: [IN DEVELOPMENT] Healing other time
and..... back to testing *chuckles*
and..... back to testing *chuckles*
adverserath
Page
Re: [TESTING] Healing other time
I seem to be testing more than playing now. I strangely enjoy this.
I seem to be testing more than playing now. I strangely enjoy this.
osd_daedalus
Knight
Re: [VALIDATION NEEDED] Healing other time
sorry for the OT, but if it's proven UOGuide tells false or inaccurate infos, just let me know and I can edit that wiki page (or edit it for yourself
)
SRC Xavier;591580 said:
sorry for the OT, but if it's proven UOGuide tells false or inaccurate infos, just let me know and I can edit that wiki page (or edit it for yourself
)LadyCrimson
Wanderer
Re: [TESTING] Healing other time
I need a new test run on the most recent fix before the 5 day timer can start.
I need a new test run on the most recent fix before the 5 day timer can start.
Xavier
Account Terminated
Re: [VALIDATION NEEDED] Healing other time
If youre having a lil trouble getting these dex/delay to work, look at it like this
By extrapolating your numbers, its easy to see that at 0 dex you would have exactly 4 second heal time.
So, start with 0 dex = 4, and 140 dex = 1.0833. The difference over 140 dex range is ~2.967 seconds. 2.967secs/140 dex == the change per dex == 0.020833 sec / dex. Your test results above completely support a linear ~0.21/10dex.
That change in ten-dex increments (0.020834*10) is pretty damn close to the differences between each of your tens. Extrapolate this the other way and you can assume that 190 dex would == 0 delay.
Try: delay = (4 - ( dex * ( 4/190 )))
This formula would get you within 10s of milliseconds of your recorded times.
adverserath;591081 said:
If youre having a lil trouble getting these dex/delay to work, look at it like this
By extrapolating your numbers, its easy to see that at 0 dex you would have exactly 4 second heal time.
So, start with 0 dex = 4, and 140 dex = 1.0833. The difference over 140 dex range is ~2.967 seconds. 2.967secs/140 dex == the change per dex == 0.020833 sec / dex. Your test results above completely support a linear ~0.21/10dex.
That change in ten-dex increments (0.020834*10) is pretty damn close to the differences between each of your tens. Extrapolate this the other way and you can assume that 190 dex would == 0 delay.
Try: delay = (4 - ( dex * ( 4/190 )))
This formula would get you within 10s of milliseconds of your recorded times.
adverserath
Page
Re: [TESTING] Healing other time
the problem with that would mean that each time is 1 second higher on each dex level, if 10 is correct with (3-(DEX/55)) at 2.81 seconds , it would become 3.78 with (4-(DEX*(4/190)))
the problem with that would mean that each time is 1 second higher on each dex level, if 10 is correct with (3-(DEX/55)) at 2.81 seconds , it would become 3.78 with (4-(DEX*(4/190)))
- Status