LadyCrimson
Wanderer
Re: [TESTING] Healing other time
back to in development...
back to in development...
UOGamers Community
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
To obtain new Razor updates, please reinstall Razor from our new website.
[SVN505] [adverserath] Healing other time
- Thread starter adverserath
- Start date
- Status
Xavier
Account Terminated
Re: [TESTING] Healing other time
Try: delay = (4 - ( dex * ( 4/190 )))
My equation gives the following results compared to your test results:
10 dex: 3.7895 You have 10 3.7917
20 dex: 3.5789 You have 20 3.5833
30 dex: 3.3684 You Have 30 3.3750
...
100 dex: 1.8947 You have 100 1.9167
...
130 dex: 1.2632 You Have 130 1.2917
(rounded all off to four decimals)
As you can see, the biggest deviance so far is about 25ms, or 2.5 100ths of a second, at 130 dex which is well below the deviance from IP latency for most people.
And, your testing results cannot be considered accurate any tighter than this due to CPU time and IP latency.
NOTE:
nevermind the NOTE, tweaking it seems to get worse in lower ranges.
adverserath;595508 said:
Try: delay = (4 - ( dex * ( 4/190 )))
My equation gives the following results compared to your test results:
10 dex: 3.7895 You have 10 3.7917
20 dex: 3.5789 You have 20 3.5833
30 dex: 3.3684 You Have 30 3.3750
...
100 dex: 1.8947 You have 100 1.9167
...
130 dex: 1.2632 You Have 130 1.2917
(rounded all off to four decimals)
As you can see, the biggest deviance so far is about 25ms, or 2.5 100ths of a second, at 130 dex which is well below the deviance from IP latency for most people.
And, your testing results cannot be considered accurate any tighter than this due to CPU time and IP latency.
NOTE:
nevermind the NOTE, tweaking it seems to get worse in lower ranges.
adverserath
Page
Re: [IN DEVELOPMENT] Healing other time
these times are for the original formula 4-(DEX/48). In post 30 on this board it was stated that they were too slow.
So i changed the formula to 3-(DEX/55). This formula heals at a max of 3 seconds, which matches osi, and also matches 110 dex. Giving these times
these times are for the original formula 4-(DEX/48). In post 30 on this board it was stated that they were too slow.
So i changed the formula to 3-(DEX/55). This formula heals at a max of 3 seconds, which matches osi, and also matches 110 dex. Giving these times
it is these middle times that are too slow.
adverserath
Page
Re: [IN DEVELOPMENT] Healing other time
using a screen recorder and an on screen stop watch i just recorded the time it takes for the bandage to apply at 10 dex. the bandage started being applied at 5.5 and was applied at 8.5 seconds. I will put this on youtube now.
using a screen recorder and an on screen stop watch i just recorded the time it takes for the bandage to apply at 10 dex. the bandage started being applied at 5.5 and was applied at 8.5 seconds. I will put this on youtube now.
adverserath
Page
Re: [IN DEVELOPMENT] Healing other time
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ciZzs2VXDso
video is uploaded, showing a 3 second (exact) heal with 10 dex. Europa server.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ciZzs2VXDso
video is uploaded, showing a 3 second (exact) heal with 10 dex. Europa server.
Xavier
Account Terminated
Re: [IN DEVELOPMENT] Healing other time
Right. So the list of times you originally posted was wrong? The math I gave you to try was based on the original times you got from your script.
I just tested it myself by SpyUO timestamps, and got ~3.05 sec at 10 dex, and ~1.25 at 120 dex. Then the timestamps started jumping all over the place after it started storming here again... so I didnt get more figures than that.
adverserath;596496 said:
Right. So the list of times you originally posted was wrong? The math I gave you to try was based on the original times you got from your script.
I just tested it myself by SpyUO timestamps, and got ~3.05 sec at 10 dex, and ~1.25 at 120 dex. Then the timestamps started jumping all over the place after it started storming here again... so I didnt get more figures than that.
adverserath
Page
Re: [IN DEVELOPMENT] Healing other time
the only thing i can think of is using a formula, or just 10 if statements.
the only thing i can think of is using a formula, or just 10 if statements.
adverserath
Page
Re: [IN DEVELOPMENT] Healing other time
not had time to do anything with this lately, as i have been working full time
I also have no OSI account now as it expired. I have increased the speed of this formula, but have also expanded the range a little.
Good luck testing this.
not had time to do anything with this lately, as i have been working full time
I also have no OSI account now as it expired. I have increased the speed of this formula, but have also expanded the range a little.
Good luck testing this.
LadyCrimson
Wanderer
Re: [IN DEVELOPMENT] Healing other time
setting back to testing
setting back to testing
LadyCrimson
Wanderer
Re: [TESTING] Healing other time
Need a tester to get the timer started.
Need a tester to get the timer started.
adverserath
Page
Re: [TESTING] Healing other time
Still dont know if there are any testers here.
Still dont know if there are any testers here.
adverserath
Page
Re: [TESTING-TC] Healing other time
healing speeds on this are alot faster than they are on demise, and more like they are on osi. Implementation would mean people can finally xheal successfully.
osi allows players to xheal in one seconds, currently on demise the minimum healtime is 3 seconds. which as far as im aware is the same healtime for an xheal at 10 dex on osi.
healing speeds on this are alot faster than they are on demise, and more like they are on osi. Implementation would mean people can finally xheal successfully.
osi allows players to xheal in one seconds, currently on demise the minimum healtime is 3 seconds. which as far as im aware is the same healtime for an xheal at 10 dex on osi.
Athena
Account Terminated
Re: [TESTING-TC] Healing other time
I've tested this and got the following results:
10 dex - 2.93 seconds
20 dex - 2.81 seconds
30 dex - 2.61 seconds
40 dex - 2.42 seconds
50 dex - 2.31 seconds
60 dex - 2.12 seconds
70 dex - 2.05 seconds
80 dex - 1.77 seconds
90 dex - 1.62 seconds
100 dex - 1.53 seconds
110 dex - 1.34 seconds
120 dex - 1.08 seconds
130 dex - 0.9 seconds
140 dex - 0.79 seconds
150 dex - 0.64 seconds
I think this is as close as it's going to get.
I've tested this and got the following results:
10 dex - 2.93 seconds
20 dex - 2.81 seconds
30 dex - 2.61 seconds
40 dex - 2.42 seconds
50 dex - 2.31 seconds
60 dex - 2.12 seconds
70 dex - 2.05 seconds
80 dex - 1.77 seconds
90 dex - 1.62 seconds
100 dex - 1.53 seconds
110 dex - 1.34 seconds
120 dex - 1.08 seconds
130 dex - 0.9 seconds
140 dex - 0.79 seconds
150 dex - 0.64 seconds
I think this is as close as it's going to get.
adverserath
Page
Re: [TESTING-TC] Healing other time
Is this on the test centre still? If not i will try it again later. I found a way of making the heal time a curve, but it needs to be done on a sin formula. But i can figure one out in matlab. I just thought large formulas may process slow. Anyone think i should try this?
Is this on the test centre still? If not i will try it again later. I found a way of making the heal time a curve, but it needs to be done on a sin formula. But i can figure one out in matlab. I just thought large formulas may process slow. Anyone think i should try this?
osd_daedalus
Knight
Re: [TESTING-TC] Healing other time
This may help you:
View attachment 21026
Yes it is a sinusoid shape, although it's not regular.
It's not really different from a linear function, though.
edit: in the part where the difference between the timer got by Athena and the linear function is bigger, the just a little higher than 0.1 seconds. In other points usually is less than 0.1 seconds. I really think this is a linear function, or it should be: I can't believe OSI coders made a so hard formula for 0.1 seconds!
edit2: trash what I have said... I did a study on your patch thinking they were OSI datas
adverserath;676809 said:
This may help you:
View attachment 21026
Yes it is a sinusoid shape, although it's not regular.
It's not really different from a linear function, though.
edit: in the part where the difference between the timer got by Athena and the linear function is bigger, the just a little higher than 0.1 seconds. In other points usually is less than 0.1 seconds. I really think this is a linear function, or it should be: I can't believe OSI coders made a so hard formula for 0.1 seconds!
edit2: trash what I have said... I did a study on your patch thinking they were OSI datas
Attachments
-
dex-secs.jpg
adverserath
Page
Re: [TESTING-TC] Healing other time
I have made a formula to make the healing time a curve, its faster for low dex and slows down in high dex levels. but doesnt allow healing to go below 0.4 seconds.
if i just add a limit like
if dex > 200
time=0.45 (or something)
my new suggested formula is <quote>3.2-(sin(DEX/130)*2.8)</quote>
the black line on the graph shows the current patch.
the blue line shows the sine graph which I could change it to.
seconds on left, dex on bottom
the text file below provides all of the times to the first 200 values.
let me know what you think, i could change the patch, or just leave it as it is.
I have made a formula to make the healing time a curve, its faster for low dex and slows down in high dex levels. but doesnt allow healing to go below 0.4 seconds.
if i just add a limit like
if dex > 200
time=0.45 (or something)
my new suggested formula is <quote>3.2-(sin(DEX/130)*2.8)</quote>
the black line on the graph shows the current patch.
the blue line shows the sine graph which I could change it to.
seconds on left, dex on bottom
the text file below provides all of the times to the first 200 values.
let me know what you think, i could change the patch, or just leave it as it is.
Attachments
osd_daedalus
Knight
Re: [TESTING-TC] Healing other time
Which are OSI values anyway? Sorry but when I have to check multiple datas in multiple posts my neural cells start to crash
I think OSI values are these:
http://www.uodemise.com/forum/showpost.php?p=591081&postcount=13
so:
10 3.791666667
20 3.583333333
30 3.375
40 3.166666667
50 2.958333333
60 2.75
70 2.541666667
80 2.333333333
90 2.125
100 1.916666667
110 1.708333333
120 1.5
130 1.291666667
140 1.083333333
In my Excel spreadsheet I get these values instead (please check if formula is correct)
View attachment 21294
but you told before:
I'm understanding little
Which are OSI values anyway? Sorry but when I have to check multiple datas in multiple posts my neural cells start to crash
I think OSI values are these:
http://www.uodemise.com/forum/showpost.php?p=591081&postcount=13
so:
10 3.791666667
20 3.583333333
30 3.375
40 3.166666667
50 2.958333333
60 2.75
70 2.541666667
80 2.333333333
90 2.125
100 1.916666667
110 1.708333333
120 1.5
130 1.291666667
140 1.083333333
In my Excel spreadsheet I get these values instead (please check if formula is correct)
View attachment 21294
but you told before:
adverserath;591001 said:
I'm understanding little
Attachments
-
timings.jpg
- Status