Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

[Ryan]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

Well I just proposed almost the same thing that you are except it's for the blues. You disagreed with it because it seemed wrong and they didn't do anything. A guy earlier stated that he was red because it is his role. You are making the assumption that all reds use their house to househide and PK people all day every day.

No - I'm absolutely not.

You're making me chuckle though.

Roleplayers are always stuck with that choice when they roleplay an 'evil'.

As for the assumption thing... you're way off base.

 

[el_hefe]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

This is to PROMOTE field fighting and stop house hiding.

Why are you trying to get rid of something that has been in the game for years? Someone thought up a good way to keep people out and get the upper hand and now its being removed. If someone is willing to chase someone to their house and attempt to kill them while in the house then they deserve to be banned. If the other party wanted to be smart they would pull the person out of the house and set up a nice little gank or something.

 

[Stides40oz]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

This has nothing to do with "PK's".

This is to PROMOTE field fighting and stop house hiding.

The way you have it actually promotes house ganking.. Houses will not be a safe haven but a place people will wait to gank people.

You got the right idea in mind but I think you need to think of how people will abuse this if it gets implemented. I mean your restocking after a fight then a guild of people you are waring with do random gates to enemys houses. Houses will be were groups of factioners search lone people for easy points.

Its a great idea but if you dont start the fight then a house should be a safe haven.

 

[Ryan]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

Why are you trying to get rid of something that has been in the game for years? Someone thought up a good way to keep people out and get the upper hand and now its being removed. If someone is willing to chase someone to their house and attempt to kill them while in the house then they deserve to be banned. If the other party wanted to be smart they would pull the person out of the house and set up a nice little gank or something.

So you're last argument is 'it's been that way for years'?

Just because its 'been that way for years' doesnt make it right.

 

[el_hefe]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

you're way off base.

It just seems as if you are trying to change the game for people that complain about others that househide. What if you attack one person and then 5 of their buddies come out and decide to attack you. How is that fair? You can't change one unfair aspect of the game and leave others open. The point is that the game is "unfair" in certain aspects. You can't change them all without ruining the game.

 

[LiquifiedArt]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

This has nothing to do with "PK's".

This is to PROMOTE field fighting and stop house hiding.

Understood... Can you explain why my way is worse then yours...?
I think the "Combative" idea is great for "Combatants" not for everyone...
Ryan what are your feelings on this??

 

[Sigler]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

Hmmmmm... I tend to stay away of places where people use to house hide.. aka britian moongate.. I guess I gotta get out more LOL

 

[el_hefe]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

No, that is not my full argument. But I did add that in there. Just because others complain about it not being fair doesn't make it wrong.

 

[Monoxide]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

The way you have it actually promotes house ganking.. Houses will not be a safe haven but a place people will wait to gank people.

You got the right idea in mind but I think you need to think of how people will abuse this if it gets implemented. I mean your restocking after a fight then a guild of people you are waring with do random gates to enemys houses. Houses will be were groups of factioners search lone people for easy points.

Its a great idea but if you dont start the fight then a house should be a safe haven.

Lock doors and put up barriers. Although it would suck coming to your house to see that it's full of enemy players.

 

[el_hefe]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

Monoxide that is exactly what is going to happen though.

 

[Stides40oz]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

Monoxide that is exactly what is going to happen though.

I know if this goes through im gona buy about 10 runebooks and start marking everyones house that starts shit with me to roll by with my guild when we're bored So atleast it would bring some fun but would then probably happen to me and piss me the fuck off

 

[skaven-hybrid]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

make it so house sitters suffer stat loss...problem isnt house hiders its house sitters people who just sit all day and keepa person pinned at a house. Why do you think people house hide? Its because of ganks.

 

[el_hefe]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

Yeah it gets rid of househiding that everyone claims is so wrong and promotes house ganking and killing people inside the house.

 

[LiquifiedArt]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

make it so house sitters suffer stat loss...problem isnt house hiders its house sitters people who just sit all day and keepa person pinned at a house. Why do you think people house hide? Its because of ganks.

umm...gotta say i definetly dont agree with anything that deals with stat loss.. you are dealing with time people spent to gm a skills and taht shouldnt be touched..Thats something that drove me and alot of others away from osi servers.

 

[el_hefe]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

Why do you think people house hide? Its because of ganks.

Yup. Thats the only time that I ever use it is when I'm getting ganked. Now they can just run up in there and blast me away while I can't ban them. It's supposed to be unfair to househide but it's okay to gank someone, especially while it's in their own house? I don't think so. This is a plot for people that complain. It's not bettering the shard in any way.

 

[el_hefe]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

Thats something that drove me and alot of others away from osi servers.

You sure that wasn't AOS? lol.

 

[Ryan]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

I'm going to go take a piss.

I love how we start some chat with the players about an idea and there's like 80 posts of garbage and 2 or 3 that have real constructive feedback.

When I get back I'm going to post something else we considered.

 

[el_hefe]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

No need to get mad that people disagree with the changes you want to put in. I remember in vent one day that someone named Ryan told me the reason that they are not making a UO: Renaissance shard because the PvP on this shard is the exact same thing as Renaissance. This proposition sure is venturing far from the type of PvP you claimed the shard is.

 

[Ryan]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

No need to get mad that people disagree with the changes you want to put in. I remember in vent one day that someone named Ryan told me the reason that they are not making a UO: Renaissance shard because the PvP on this shard is the exact same thing as Renaissance. This proposition sure is venturing far from the type of PvP you claimed the shard is.

good lord...

I am not mad.

I just stated my opinion.

If I'm mad I will tell you I'm mad.

 

[el_hefe]

Re: Proposed changes to housing ruleset:

But you are quick to claim that what we are posting is garbage. our opinions are not garbage. It seems like you don't want to acknowledge our posts simply because they disagree.